This week the subject is one of my pet peeves. When discussing technology, people often say, "We don't need that in schools!"
|
Posted: 05 Nov 2011 08:58 AM PDT
![]()
Here's a statement that I'm getting really tired of hearing:
I'm sure that this argument was offered in the past as well:
At some point we have to label this what it is: ridiculous. When we actually acknowledge and support this misbegotten, history-blind nostalgia, all it does is delay our much-needed recognition that the world is constantly changing and that we need to adapt in thoughtful but necessary ways. Change be can scary, but there's a huge difference between intelligent, reflective criticism and mindless, reactionary dismissal.
Remember all of the hubbub a few years back when everyone above the age of 30 was absolutely convinced that Facebook was PURE EVIL? Then they started using it themselves and realized that it was just another (albeit different) way to communicate. The furor died down and we started having interesting conversations about when and how Facebook might be a useful learning tool. How many of those Facebook-is-pure-evil folks reflected on that process and resolved to think about the next new technology differently? How many of them apologized to the young people in their lives for their knee-jerk comments a few years back? Very few, if any.
Is it wrong of me to wish that people who espouse this view be prohibited from holding political office or serving on school boards?
[cross-posted at Education Recoded] Related posts: |

No comments:
Post a Comment